
Our take: The market is still trying to stabilise, but the quality of that stabilisation remains weak. Macro continues to matter more than crypto-native positives: March payrolls rose 178k, and unemployment fell to 4.3%, which pushed Treasury yields higher and reduced the market’s confidence in near-term Fed easing, even as US services activity slipped into contraction for the first time since 2023. At the same time, JPMorgan estimated crypto flows fell to around $11B in Q1, roughly one-third of the year-ago pace, reinforcing the idea that this is a market attempting to base on limited sponsorship rather than one being pulled higher by broad inflows. That combination fits the chart set cleanly: crypto is no longer in freefall, but it is still trading beneath broken structure and underperforming stronger risk assets.



Our take: Bitcoin is still in base-building mode beneath supply, not in trend restoration. The constructive side of the tape is that treasury-style demand remains alive: Metaplanet added 5,075 BTC to bring total holdings to 40,177 BTC, while broader institutional access keeps expanding through products, custody, and listed vehicles. But that demand is being partially neutralised by real supply. Riot sold 3,778 BTC worth about $290M during the first quarter, while bitcoin also closed its worst first quarter since 2018, underscoring how weak the broader backdrop has been. The result is a market that can squeeze higher on positioning, but still struggles to reclaim broken shelves cleanly enough to change the regime.

Our take: Ethereum’s fundamental setup improved at the margin, but the price has not validated it yet. The Ethereum Foundation has now staked more than two-thirds of its 70,000 ETH target, which supports the medium-term treasury/yield story and makes the ecosystem look more institutionally legible. But the market is still treating ETH as a laggard: ETHUSD remains below both the June 2022 AVWAP and the nearby reclaim band, while ETH/BTC is only stabilising rather than rotating back into leadership. This leaves ETH in a “better plumbing, weaker tape” regime, constructive under the surface, but still short of technical confirmation.


Our take: Both SOL and BNB still read as repair charts, not leadership charts. SOL continues to hold the 2024-lows support region, but until it can reclaim the $112-$113 zone, the move remains a low-base rather than a genuine leadership re-emergence. BNB tells a similar story: the rebound is visible, but the price is still comfortably below the prior breakout shelf, leaving it in recovery mode rather than re-acceleration. This is why broad alt participation still looks incomplete — support is being defended, but the higher-beta leaders have not yet taken back the levels needed to confirm a true regime shift.


Our take: The strongest alpha narratives remain the ones backed by identifiable structural catalysts rather than generic rebound beta. TAO stands out because the AI narrative is being underwritten by improving confidence in distributed training, which gives the bid more substance than a simple “AI basket” reflex. HYPE remains one of the cleanest market-structure trades in crypto, as on-chain perps keep taking share from centralised venues. XRP rounds out the cluster through the payments-and-access channel: stronger rails, wider distribution, and a clearer institutional-use case than most large-cap laggards. In a tape where broad beta is still struggling, these are the types of names most capable of attracting selective capital.
Our take: The most durable theme in crypto remains institutionalisation beneath the surface. The market may still be trapped in a macro-constrained range, but regulation, custody, licensing, charter activity, and tokenised-product expansion all continue to move in one direction: toward deeper integration with the traditional financial stack. That helps explain why crypto is not collapsing despite poor relative performance. Spot is weak, but the rails continue to strengthen.
Our take: The next macro test is straightforward: does incoming inflation data validate the market’s fear that the war-driven oil and shipping shock is leaking into broader price expectations, or does it stay contained enough to preserve room for a later easing cycle? CPI and the Michigan inflation-expectations component matter most because they will frame the immediate inflation psychology. FOMC minutes matter less for backwards-looking detail than for how investors map the March meeting onto the current higher-for-longer backdrop. ISM Services also matters after March’s surprise contraction, because another weak print would reinforce the “slowing activity, sticky inflation” mix that has been so difficult for crypto. For markets, that means rallies are still likely to struggle beneath overhead supply unless inflation softens and geopolitical stress stops escalating. For BTC specifically, a softer inflation impulse would give the market its best chance to press back into the $71k-$76k band; absent that, the dominant regime remains stabilisation inside damaged structure, not confirmed recovery.
Bottom line: this remains a market trying to stabilise with better rails than tape. BTC is building a base but still sits below reclaim levels, ETH’s infrastructure story is improving faster than its price, SOL and BNB are defending support rather than leading, and the cleanest alpha continues to sit in targeted themes rather than broad beta. Until macro pressure eases and the major charts recover broken shelves, the right framing is still repair, not renewal.
Thanks for reading this week's Market Pulse.